Homosexuality from a Sociological Perspective Essay

I understand that we do not see nerve centre to eye on most of the ejects I brought up in my previous letter. I also understand how you craving for me to convey that I understand what we incur discussed in class over the past couple months from a sociological perspective. I would like to go ahead and explain that now and then perhaps besides explain where I was coming from originally.There atomic number 18 two basic ways to view the populace of homo charge upuality through the essentialist model and through the social constructionist model. The essentialist argues that homosexuality is a natural, universal category that exists self-directed of culture, time, or situation. (David Greenberg) They regard the fundamental reality of homosexuality as residing in sexual orientation. in causeal behavior is secondary in nature. Concisely their goal in life is to find out what causes psyche to prefer same-sex partners.Social constructionists however believe that homosexuality is not a concrete reality, but or else a phenomenon that exists because of the way it is defined socially, culturally, and situationally. (David Greenberg) They are interested in the recognition of separate categories of humanity ground on sexual orientation, as well as treatment based on that fact. They think that cosmos a homosexual is experienced differently between different people, according to the social context at bottom which it takes place, and that what it dream ups to be a homosexual can vary across the board.From what youve taught us this semester so farther Ive come to the understanding that there is no single infallible measure of homosexuality. I mean what actually defines a homosexual. Just the thought or desire to be with someone of the same sex, or is it perhaps a kiss with Madonna on MTV. Does one actually defecate to commit a sexual act behind closed doors with someone of the same sex to be labeled a homosexual? These are some of the suspicions we have discussed in class, which have led me to the conclusion that homosexual sex is multidimensional.Throughout my readings in the Reader, I have learned that male and femalehomosexual expression are very different in nature. They have dramatically different homosexual styles. For example, males tend to act on homosexual desires more(prenominal) so than women do, while women tend to have their feelings and desires about homosexual behavior brewage longer before they act upon them.Ive learned that many homosexuals claim that they have no more choice in becoming gay than heterosexuals did in being straight. Ive learned that a component or set of genes could predispose men to becoming homosexual from the on start of their life. Which of course begs the question of whether or not this gene can be fixed before a child is born, to resign the child to leave a normal life.I brought up the gene issue to my good sponsor Ryll and asked about her brother, who is a homosexual, and asked her if it were p ossible did she think her brother would choose to have his gene altered in order to make him straight? She answered no, because that was the life he was used to, and to change it now would be more detrimental to him then just staying the way he was.Bottom line is homosexuality is a rule of deviant behavior simply because most members of our society do not approve of it, and because this disapproval takes the form of condemnation and punishment of homosexuals and strained, difficult relations betweens straights and gays.I would like to clear up one issue if you have time the difference between deviance and sin as I see it. non all deviant behavior falls under the category of sin. However, all sin is deviant in my opinion. I do not believe sin to be socially constructed as deviance is. I believe people interchange the words more often than they should. I still hold accredited to my personal semi-absolutist perspective of sin. I believe that there is a sense of wrong that is not ti ed(p) in to culture or society I believe that this sense of wrong is because there is then an absolute when it comes to right and wrong. I further believe that we, as a human race, never master at keeping any standard of right and wrong, much less the absolute standard that Ive referred to.Sin is anything that we do that does not please God. This is not due to an arbitrary set of rules that we follow, instead it is declarative of the character of God. I know I have done many things wrong I have sinned. How do I know this? I feel a conviction in my heart when I do something that I know is wrong. It pains me when I sin. However, even if I have become cauterise to the wrong that I do, it does not mean that the things I do are no longer wrong. So the most important indication of sin is judging against the character of God. Where can the character of God be found? In the Bible of course. Ill stop there because I doubt you want to be preached to in this letter. I simply wanted to atte mpt to show you how I see sin as not being socially constructed at all, but at the same time showing that I understand how deviance is socially constructed. I do hope this short explanation of what I have learned thus far in your class entrust be sufficient for this assignment. I will continue, of course, with new material when the next letter is due.